← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/5323/2024allowed

Sukhjit Singh And Another v. State Of Punjab And Another

2024-03-20Mr. Justice Alok Jain2 pages

-12024:PHHC:040439 CRM-M-5323-2024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH (285) CRM-M-5323-2024 Date of Decision:-March 20, 2024 Sukhjit Singh and another ......Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and another ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN ****

Present:

Mr. Joginder Pal, Advocate for Mr. Amit Saini, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. R.S. Bhatta, DAG, Punjab.

Mr. Aman Pratap Singh, Advocate for respondent No. 2.

**** ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) 1.

The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No. 0106 dated 09.07.2020, under Sections 323, 325, 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 registered at Police Station Bullowal, District Hosiarpur (Annexure P-1) and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 02.01.2024 (Annexure P-3).

2.

Keeping in view the fact that the parties entered into a compromise, this Court vide order dated 01.02.2024 directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa Magistrate/trial Court for getting their statements recorded in that regard. Pursuant thereto, a report dated 27.02.2024 has been received from the Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Hoshiarpur, stating that the compromise arrived at between the parties is voluntary and the same is without any pressure, coercion or undue influence. PARUL 2024.03.23 10:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

-22024:PHHC:040439 CRM-M-5323-2024 3.

Learned State Counsel and learned counsel for respondent No. 2 admit the factum of compromise and submit that they have no objection to quashing of the FIR on that basis. 4.

Perusal of the aforesaid report establishes that the parties have amicably settled their dispute, and continuance of criminal proceedings in such a situation will be an exercise in futility, as the chances of ultimate conviction are bleak. The power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. can be exercised in such matters. It has been held by Supreme Court of India in cases Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and another 2012(10) SCC 303 and Narinder Singh and others v. State of Punjab and another 2014(6) SCC 406 that criminal cases having overwhelmingly civil character, particularly those arising out of commercial transactions or matrimonial relationships or family disputes, should be quashed when the parties have resolved their disputes among themselves in a bona fide manner. 5.

Consequently, this petition is allowed. FIR No. 0106 dated 09.07.2020, under Sections 323, 325, 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 registered at Police Station Bullowal, District Hosiarpur (Annexure P-1) and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, are hereby quashed qua the petitioners, subject to payment of cost of Rs. 20,000/- to be deposited by the petitioners jointly and Rs. 10,000/- to be deposited by respondent No.2 within one month from today in Poor Patients Welfare Fund, PGIMER, Chandigarh.

(ALOK JAIN) JUDGE March 20, 2024 Parul Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No PARUL 2024.03.23 10:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document