Raj Kumar And Others v. State Of Haryana And Others

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh Civil Writ Petition No. 3175 of 2021 Date of Decision: 03.09.2021 Raj Kumar and Another ... Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Haryana and Others ... Respondent(s) CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal.

Present:

Mr. Akshay Kumar Jindal, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

Mr. Samarth Sagar, Additional Advocate General, Haryana with Mr. Shivendra Swaroop, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana, for respondent No.1 and 3.

Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate, with Ms. Kushaldeep K. Manchanda and Mr. Shivam Garg, Advocates, for respondent No.2.

Anil Kshetarpal, J.

1.

The hearing of the case was held through video conferencing on account of restricted functioning of the Courts. 2.

Notice of motion.

3.

At the request of the Court, Mr.Samarth Sagar, Additional Advocate General, Haryana, along with Mr.Shivendra Swaroop, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.1 and 3. Mr.Ankur Mittal, Advocate, along with Ms.Kushaldeep K. Manchanda and Mr.Shivam Garg, Advocates, has put in appearance on behalf of respondent No.2-Haryana State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation.

DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2021.09.06 14:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Civil Writ Petition No. 3175 of 2021 4.

Learned counsel for the parties are ad-idem that the present petition may be disposed of in terms of the decision rendered by this Court in Narender Kumar @ Narender Singh and others vs. State of Haryana and others (Civil Writ Petition No. 10859 of 2021, decided on 29.06.2021). 5.

Ordered accordingly.

(Anil Kshetarpal) Judge September 03, 2021 "DK"

Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2021.09.06 14:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document