Sunita And Another v. State Of Haryana And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH 112 (PROCEEDINGS THROUGH HYBRID MODE) CRWP-965-2025 Date of decision: January 30th, 2025 Sunita and another .....Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and others .....Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL

Present:

Ms. Hasan Kaur, Advocate for the petitioners (through V.C.).

MANJARI NEHRU KAUL , J. (ORAL) Prayer in the instant petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is for issuance of directions to respondents No.1 to 3, to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of private respondents No.4 and 5 (family members of petitioner No.1), who are averse to their live-in relationship. 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been in a live-in relationship and they are continuously being threatened with dire consequences by the private respondents. Hence, there is a genuine apprehension of the life of the petitioners being in peril. Resultantly, a representation dated 23.01.2025 (Annexure P-3) was also made to respondent No.2-Superintendent of Police, Panipat, for protection of their life and liberty, but in vain. Learned counsel submits that the petitioners would be satisfied if directions are issued to respondent No.2-Superintendent of Police, Panipat, to look into their representation (Annexure P-3) and take appropriate steps at the earliest. PUNEET SACHDEVA 2025.01.30 14:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CRWP-965-2025 -23.

Notice of motion to official respondents only. 4.

On asking of the Court, Mr. Rahul Mohan, Senior Deputy Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents. 5.

In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of with a directions to respondent No.2-Superintendent of Police, Panipat, to look into the representation dated 23.01.2025 (Annexure P-3) qua the alleged threat perception and take necessary steps, as may be required, in accordance with law, to ensure that the life and liberty of the petitioners is not jeopardized at the hands of the private respondents. However, this direction will have no effect on any civil or criminal action, which could be initiated in the matter in accordance with law. January 30th, 2025 (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) Puneet JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

No PUNEET SACHDEVA 2025.01.30 14:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh