Anil Kumar v. Vivek Aggarwal

[107]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF

F PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGA ARH COCP-39 91-2026 (O&M) Decision : 19.03.2026 Date of D mar son of Shri Rampal Sharma Anil Kum Vivek Ag Education

...Petitioner

Versus

ggarwal, IRS, Director, Elementa ary n, Haryana, Panchkula ....Respondent Coram :

Present:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P PANKAJ JAIN Mr. Parth Goyal, Advocate f Mr. Naveen Singh Panwar, D **** J JAIN, J. (ORAL) for the petitioner.

DAG, Haryana.

PANKAJ [1] Learned State Counsel h has produced demand draft(s s) amounting g to ₹ 25,000/- each. Copy of sa ame are taken on record as Mark k 'X'. Orig ginal demand drafts have been supplied to learned counsel fo or the petitio oner.

[2] In view of the above, no fu urther orders are required to b e passed. T The present contempt petition sta ands disposed off.

[3] All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand ds disposed o off.

(PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE 19.03.202 'R. Sharma'

RAJNEESH SHARMA 2026.03.23 18:00 I agree to specified portions of this document Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable :

Yes/No :

Yes/No