Sunita And ANR v. State Of Haryana And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Writ Petition No. 1326 of 2022 Date of Decision: 14.02.2022 Sunita and another .......... Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and others .......... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESHWAR THAKUR

Present:

Mr. Deepak K. Bartia, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Pradeep Prakash Chahar, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana (Through Video Conferencing) **** SURESHWAR THAKUR, J. (ORAL) 1.

The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of a mandamus hence directing respondent Nos. 2 & 3 to give protection to the life and liberty of the petitioners, and against any interference in the peaceful life of the petitioners being made at the behest of respondent Nos. 4 to 6. 2.

The learned State Counsel, does not have any objection, to an order being made by this Court to respondents concerned, to look into and decide through a speaking order, representation Annexure P-7. 3.

Consequently, this Court directs respondents concerned, to within three weeks hereafter, hence decide Annexure P-7, through a speaking order.

4.

Petition is disposed of.

5.

A copy of this order be given dasti on payment of usual charges.

February 14, 2022 ( SURESHWAR THAKUR ) 'dk kamra'

JUDGE Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No DINESH KUMAR 2022.02.14 15:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document