← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/2384/2024disposed of

Rajat Gupta v. State Of Haryana And Others

2024-02-05Mr. Justice Tribhuvan Dahiya2 pages

CWP No.2384 of 2024 -1- 2024:PHHC:015117 

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH ***** CWP No.2384 of 2024 Date of Decision : 5.2.2024 Rajat Gupta ..... Petitioner versus State of Haryana and others ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present: Mr. Madhur Jangra, Advocate, for the petitioner Ms. Tanushree Gupta, DAG, Haryana Mr. Deepak Balyan, Advocate, for respondents no.3 and 4 --- TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA J. (ORAL):

The petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to review the result of HTET (Haryana Teacher Eligibility Test) Level-3-PGT (Computer Science), conducted by respondent no.3 on 2.12.2023, on the ground of discrepancy regarding answer to question no.88, and to restraint the respondents from continuing with the further recruitment process, including interview or in the alternative, permit the petitioner to participate in the recruitment process provisionally.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that at this stage, the petitioner will be satisfied in case his pending legal notice dated 28.12.2023, Annexure P-11, is considered and decided by respondent no.3 in a specified period.

3.

Notice of motion.

4.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents no.3 and 4 Ashwani Kumar 2024.02.07 14:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP No.2384 of 2024 -2- 2024:PHHC:015117  contends that the petitioner's pending legal notice shall be considered and decided expeditiously.

5.

In view thereof, without going into the merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with a direction to third respondent/Secretary, Haryana Board of Secondary Education, Bhiwani, to consider and decide the petitioner's pending legal notice dated 28.12.2023, within a period of two months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. 6.

In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the officer concerned shall pay costs of Rs.25,000/- to the petitioner. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE 5.2.2024 Ashwani   Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No  Ashwani Kumar 2024.02.07 14:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document