Meenakhi Garg And ORS v. State Of Haryana And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-3306-2021 Date of decision : 12.02.2021 Meenakshi Garg and others .......Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and others .......Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI SHANKER JHA, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL

Present:

Mr. Joydeep Mazumdar, Advocate, for the petitioners.

Mr. Ankur Mittal, Addl. A.G., Haryana, with Mr. Saurabh Mago, Asst. A.G., Haryana.

(The aforesaid presence is being recorded through video conferencing since the proceedings are being conducted in virtual Court).

**** RAVI SHANKER JHA, CHIEF JUSTICE ( Oral ) This petition has been filed by the petitioners assailing the order dated 04.01.2021/Transfer policy of the respondent authorities (Annexure P-3), relating to transfer of employees of the Department of Food, Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs, Haryana.

Learned Additional Advocate General, Haryana, on instructions, submits that the representation filed by the petitioners pursuant to the observations made by this Court in the order dated 15.01.2021 (Annexure P-7) rendered in the previous petition, namely CWP-1101-2021, filed by the petitioners, has been considered and decided by the Administrative Secretary of the Department of Food, Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs, Government of NAROTAM DASS 2021.02.15 13:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC CHANDIGARH Haryana, which has been communicated to the petitioners by the Director of the

CWP-3306-2021 -2Department vide order dated 05.02.2021 (Annexure P-9). He submits that the explanations given to the clauses of the policy, as contained in the order of the Administrative Secretary of the Department, would form part of the policy, while considering the cases relating to transfer. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that in view of the statement of learned Additional Advocate General, Haryana, the petitioners may be permitted to withdraw the petition with liberty to the individuals, who are aggrieved by his/her transfer, to take up the case before the appropriate forum in accordance with law.

Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. ( RAVI SHANKER JHA ) CHIEF JUSTICE ( SUVIR SEHGAL ) JUDGE February 12, 2021 ndj Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No NAROTAM DASS 2021.02.15 13:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC CHANDIGARH