Randeep Singh @ Rana And ORS. v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH Crl. Appeal No.D-398-DB of 2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: February 10, 2020 Randeep Singh @ Rana and other ...Appellants

VERSUS

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA CHAUHAN HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI

Present:

Mr.Sartej Singh Narula, Advocate for appellants namely Randeep Singh @ Rana, Parveen Kumar @ Kaka, Vivek @ Kali and Prabhjot @ Rajji.

Mr.Ravinder Bangal, Advocate for appellant namely Rajesh Kumar @ Don.

Mr.Brijender Kaushik, Advocate for appellant namely Mohit @ Kaga.

Mr.Baldev Singh Badhran, Advocate for appellant namely Chaman Lal.

Mr.Vikrant Pamboo, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana for the respondent-State.

**** ARCHANA PURI, J.

For detailed reasons recorded in judgment of even date, passed in CRA No.D-335-DB of 2017 titled as Bhim Sain alias Kaka Ganth vs. State of Haryana, which shall form part of this order, the present appeal is dismissed qua appellants-Randeep Singh @ Rana and Rajesh Kumar @ Don, whereas, it is allowed qua appellants Parveen Kumar @ Kala, Vivek @ Kali, Mohit @ Kaga, Chaman Lal and Prabhjot @ Rajji. (JITENDRA CHAUHAN) (ARCHANA PURI) JUDGE JUDGE February 10, 2020 Vgulati Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No VINEET GULATI 2020.08.28 10:08 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh