Neena Bansal v. Bank Of Baroda

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No. 3528 of 2021 Date of Decision: October 14, 2022 **** Neena Bansal

...Petitioner

Versus

Bank of Baroda

...Respondent

Coram:

Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.S. Ramachandra Rao Hon'ble Mr. Justice H.S. Madaan *** Present:- Mr. Saurabh Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. C.S. Pasricha, Advocate for the respondent. **** M.S. Ramachandra Rao, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the Writ Petition has become infructuous and the same be disposed of. Dismissed as infructuous.

No costs.

(M.S. Ramachandra Rao) Judge (H.S. Madaan) Judge October 14, 2022 P.Singh Whether speaking/reasoned?

Yes/No Whether Reportable?

Yes/No PARVINDER SINGH 2022.10.18 10:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document