Parvesh Sharma v. Atul Kumar Divedi And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH.
COCP No. 468 of 2020 (O&M) Date of Decision: February 26, 2020 Parvesh Sharma ..........PETITIONER
VERSUS
Atul Kumar Divedi and another ........RESPONDENTS CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA
Present:
Mr. Kuldeep Choudhary, Advocate for Mr. Sachin Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Apoorv Garg, D.A.G., Haryana.
******* SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) Affidavit of Dr. Sushma Nain, District Ayurvedic Officer, Rohtak on behalf of respondent No. 2 filed by learned State counsel today in the Court is taken on record.
Learned State counsel submits that the petitioner has been allowed to join at Rohtak and the respondents are in process for releasing the salary of petitioner.
In view of submission of learned State counsel, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition. Dismissed as withdrawn.
Rule discharged.
( SURINDER GUPTA ) JUDGE February 26, 2020 Jyoti-II Whether speaking/reasoned:
Yes/No Whether Reportable:
Yes/No JYOTI 2020.02.27 13:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document