Jashandeep Singh And ORS v. State Of Punjab And Another

CRM-M-8789-2025 (O&M) 1



    
  
         !"# $%&%!'()*+* 


   




 

     

 (  ,-.* .
/

.
      

!

"#$ "  

# % %

& "##&"

 #

'(!

"#$ "  )  $   ***** /

.
0*  + )    

 , 
  -  .

'

  %
 %


  "/ 0.

"/ 12

34  5   6/5/7" 
  768# 49     , 
 
&:

,

")

,(



;  ) ) " 

 ,,    2 ,      !  

  !!  +6++/70#<1  = ,   ,    ,  

,  )  9 :

, 

    ! $    >//-"               , 9?4,,

     ! :    !!  7     

 "    +/ /-

 $! 
 ;$  ,   ,   "(



#

CRM-M-8789-2025 (O&M) 2 

,

$ ,

 !     

$    

":



$ 

 !



 , :  !  '

$ 

 

   34 2    2

 )  !!    :  !   " :  ',     - ) 3,,.  9




   



   

!

"#" ,

= 9

 : 
  7 99  ,,:   !  8 !

,  2

  :

 = 9  $:



!:

2$

  

, : :       ) :2

  !

! ,  , 5 =@ , 
!9

$







      "

%

!

#% "



$

              $ 

   

  9"   :     '   9  2

 ! ,   :

 !!

 ) ,$   ->

 ! 

8 "57. The position that emerges from the above discussion can be summarised thus: the power of the High Court in quashing a criminal proceeding or FIR or complaint in exercise of its inherent jurisdiction is distinct and different from the power given to a criminal court for compounding the offences under Section 320 of the Code.

CRM-M-8789-2025 (O&M) 3 Inherent power is of wide plenitude with no statutory limitation but it has to be exercised in accord with the guideline engrafted in such power viz; (i) to secure the ends of justice or (ii) to prevent abuse of the process of any Court. xxx xxx xxx. "

> 4$: 8 ! "    ,9  !

, ,! : 0 1   !,  " 9

2

 34:,,  2  ,,  :         

'

 ,   ,,) " , :,

$                 

 "  ! ,    

 $ 2

   , ,'"       ,,:  34  5  6/5/7"
 768#49  , 
 
 &:

,

")

,(



;  ) ) "



,,   2 ,  2

2  

    !!    +6++/7 0#< 1" &345 $ ! 78 '!" &*09!4 # 6!&% #47: 6 %%!' 1 & %':  !!1

% ' ; 2"

1  3'#0 
 0 :

'#%< 1: =%:%'  6 1%!# !" !'  8!':* 9.

Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.    /

.


    )*+*   !


     %?

 B ?  

,   B ?