Ram Nath v. State Of Haryana And ORS.
YOGESH SHARMA 2018.11.16 14:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-12757-1996 (O&M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH CWP-12757-1996 (O&M) Date of decision : 15.11.2018 Ram Nath ... Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others ... Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI
Present:
Mr. Vivek Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Vikrant Pamboo, Deputy A.G., Punjab.
Mr. R.S. Chahar, Advocate for respondent No.5.
**** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J.
Counsel for the petitioner states that in view of lapse of time, the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous. Keeping in view the said statement made by counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.
( HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI ) JUDGE 15.11.2018 Yogesh Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/ No Whether Reportable Yes/ No