Raj Rani And Another v. Birmati And Others

CR-1252-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH (121) CR-1252-2026 Date of Decision:-09.03.2026 Raj Rani and Another ......Petitioners

Versus

Smt. Birmati Devi and Others ......Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL ****

Present:

Mr. Rajesh Goyal, Advocate, for the appellants.

**** AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (Oral) 1.

The present civil revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for directing the learned Appellate Court, Panipat to decide the application for stay filed by the petitioner. 2.

At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the application for stay has already been decided by the learned Court and, therefore, no effective relief survives for adjudication in the present petition.

3.

In view of the above submission, the present civil revision petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. 4.

All pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE 09.03.2026 Shubham Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No SHUBHAM 2026.03.11 10:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/order