Bhagwan Das Makhija v. State Of Haryana
CRM-M-7289-2021 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CRM-M-7289-2021 Date of Decision: 17.08.2021 Bhagwan Das Makhija Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN
Present:
Mr. J.S. Bedi, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rubal Garg, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Dimple Jain, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. **** AVNEESH JHINGAN, J (Oral):
[1] The matter is taken up for hearing through video conference due to COVID-19 situation.
[2] This is a petition seeking anticipatory bail in F.I.R. No. 3, dated 14th January, 2021, under Sections 7, 7A, 11 and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 [hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'] and Section 180 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, registered at Police Station SVB, Faridabad.
[3] On 16th February, 2021, the contention raised was that at the most, the allegation against the petitioner that he compromised the matter with the complainant and other private persons does not attract the provisions of the Act. Notice of motion was issued and arrest of the petitioner was stayed. After issuance of notice of motion, the petitioner PANKAJ BAWEJA 2021.08.17 15:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-7289-2021 -2joined investigation.
[4] Learned State counsel, on instructions from D.S.P. Kailash Chand, submits that petitioner has joined the investigation and is cooperating. His custodial interrogation is not necessary. [5] In view of above noted development, the petitioner is granted anticipatory bail subject to furnishing adequate bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer. He is directed to join the investigation as and when called for. He shall abide by the conditions as envisaged under Section 438 (2) of Cr.P.C.
[6] The petition is allowed.
[AVNEESH JHINGAN] JUDGE 17th August, 2021
1. Whether speaking/ reasoned :
Yes / No
2. Whether reportable :
Yes / No PANKAJ BAWEJA 2021.08.17 15:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH