Dalip Kaur And ANR v. The P,O. L/C

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-10455-1998 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 18.05.2024 DALIP KAUR AND ANR .....PETITIONERS

VERSUS

THE PRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT AND OTHERS .....RESPONDENTS

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH.

Present:

Mr. Gautam Kaila, Advocate, for Mr. Mukand Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioners.

Mr. Amit Chaudhary, DAG, Punjab.

SANJAY VASHISTH, J (ORAL) 1.

On the previous date of hearing i.e. 03.04.2024, a direction was issued for issuance of the notice to the petitioners at the addresses mentioned in the memo of parties of the present writ petition. 2.

As per office note dated 15.05.2024, notices issued to the petitioners have been received back unserved with a report "as both the petitioners have died".

3.

Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that in the absence of present status and details of the legal representatives of the petitioners, he is unable to assist the Court. 4.

Accordingly, present writ petition stands dismissed for nonprosecution. LAVISHA 2024.05.18 18:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh

CWP-10455-1998 (O&M) -25.

However, liberty is granted to the petitioners to move an appropriate application for bringing on record the legal representatives of the petitioners as well as the application for seeking revival of the present writ petition, within a period of three months from today, in case, any substantive issue still exists along with a cause of action to the petitioners.

(SANJAY VASHISTH) 18.05.2024 JUDGE Lavisha Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No LAVISHA 2024.05.18 18:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh