Ram Narayan Alias Vikas And Another v. State Of Haryana And Another
! "
#
$!!! %& ' % # $( )!
%&&*%" $"
! %& ' % #
!"#$% %!&'(!")
* + +
# , -
! . / / #
0 1
0 2+ 3 4 0
!
5%4+ /% -
! 2 %(
-
2 - -- 1 #
.557&
8 9 #
,-
:
-$0
%2 %
5#
,- &
-!
:
0%2 # -
.55% ,
;
'
57&
8 9 & # % #-
#
- 0
, # 0 2+%6
6 --0 # -%
<
!
,
%%; #8
, =
-
#-
6- # #'
'
"6'% 6 , %%;
%6
(
- 0 #-
6
-
0-0- 0
, = ,
#-
% 2+6 0
' 0 / -- 6 #
-%- -/
0
! + / ! 5+ / ', #' 0
, # %6 %
<
!
6
0
! 4+ /
6
0
! + / - -% , # 6
6
0 0 #
6
%;
,-
:
$0
%2 '
.55( #
-
,6 ##-, - &
-!
:
0%2 "6'%
0,
% - &##--/
##- -
'
5> # '##
/ ,6
#
'
#
,
0/445
/ 45"6'%
#
, '
#
% # # , - #
0 1
0 2+
1 #
,
5 <
- # , 6
' # ,- % , #
#
#-
'
,- -'
#
,
+
,
'
5 - , #-
!
#? , #- &
8 3" ,
#
'
% #
#-
,) # 0 2+ - 1 #
, /
,-6 1
0 " ,
% 2+
1
5 #
- ) 0
,, / ,-6, 1
" - # 2 -->
:
0
/ -
,-.(/0'#& /01% !0'
23%#&$ 4$
3!3# -0"!6 !0'
!023%#&) 7 *8+ 9: ;
!<12=!.
!0'
!023%#& 4$
3!3# !'%>!
&!'#$%) 9* + *&/</0!.+ 8 ;
!0'
-6# /01% !0'
!023%#& 4$
3!3# !&>!0!
!0'
!023%#&
) 98* + *&/</0!.+ 9
<
- #
#-
,
,
- #
%
,
# ,6 #
-'
,- " % ,) # 0 2+- 1 #
1
(
/ '
3
# ##, -/ ;+--1$0
%
, / %
-/ ;+--1$0
6 -
# 4 + # %-
:
-$0
% 2 # 45 @ # %
8
- #
#-
!
# ?
# -%
<
!
&!+ - # ? 5= ,
%-
:
$0
%2
#
## , 0
% '-
6
- + ,
#
, - # -
#
6--
,
02+.3 4%
!
4+ /% -
! 2 , 6'% 6
% 6 %
<
!
6 '
- # -
+
-
# #
%
6
'-'
% 6
6 6
<
!
6
'-'
6
6
, 3 + ' -
- # %#
# ,-
:
-$0
%2 . &,# - #'
./ /6 -
6 "
/
% ,
'
/ #' , #
/ 6
)
! 5/ /
1 -- -'
% 6
#
, #
#
0
+
-/ " A,-! #/
!<12=!.
?
3!3# !'%>!
&!'#$% #9 -
B5+##
'-'
6 #
- # ' % ,
-- # '
- , ##-
0
"
0 #
-
- '
0)
!
- ##-
0-6 ' -
-6 ,) -6 -8 #
+0
0%
#
% "
/ 0 8
% #
'
6
%
, ' %
0
%,
%,
(
8
8
#6
! ./ /%356 - ,
)
(
,
-
#6 "
/ -)
&
'
#6
! ./ /%35-
#
)
% 6
0 '
% - 0'
)
=
', #' 0
## %
, 0 , 8
% -, '
/
!&/0'#& /01% @ &$
3!3# -0"!6 @ &$ ) * 9 +
!A</
!&!>!0 7! #9 CCCCCC @
#
- ## ! 5 / /% 35 6 /
1 - 0
,
,6 #
#
#
,-A 6
6 % 8
#6 )
# "
/
! ./ /%35'
/
&
- /
,
' ,
,
! 5/ /%35 -
%6
#6 6
#- 0 ,8
--
8 1
%,
7
D
9!
) % D7
9-
,6
'
D E 7 '9 /
#
% #
# #
; -'
F " A,-
>
/
-6# /01% $ #9, '
4 B20.It has thus been ascertained to our satisfaction and stands established that the compromise arrived at between the parties is genuine, willful and bona fide. It is also proved that the petitioners and respondent No.2 are living under the same roof. In fact, to remove any sort of doubts regarding the genuineness of the compromise, respondent No.2 appeared before us along with her daughter and made a statement on oath on 3.4.2013 in support of the compromise. She also stated that the parties are living under the one roof and she is being well looked after by her sons, namely, the petitioners.
21. In the light of these peculiar facts and circumstances where not only the parties but their close relatives (including daughter and son-in-law of respondent No.2) have also supported the amicable settlement, we are of the considered view that the negation of the compromise would disharmonize the relationship and cause a permanent rift amongst the family members who are living together as a joint family. Nonacceptance of the compromise would also lead to denial of complete justice which is the very essence of out justice delivery system. Since there is no statutory embargo against invoking of power under Section 482 Criminal Procedure Code after conviction of an accused by the trial Court and during pendency of appeal against such conviction, it appears to be a fit case to invoke the inherent jurisdiction and strike down the proceedings subject to certain safeguards.
22. Consequently and for the reasons afore-stated, we allow this petition and set aside the judgement and order dated 16.3.2009 passed in Criminal Case No.425-1 of 2000 of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hisar, on the basis of compromise dated 08.08.2011 arrived at between them and their step-mother respondent No.2 (Smt. Reshma Devi) w/o late Rajmal qua the petitioners only. As a necessary corollary, the criminal complaint filed by respondent No.2 is dismissed qua the petitioners on the basis of above-stated compromise.
3 Resultantly, the appeal preferred by the petitioners against the above-mentioned order dated 16.3.2009 would be rendered infructuous and shall be so declared by the first Appellate Court at Hisar."
?#
'
6 --0 -
, # '
,- -
# %
6 - , -8
( " A,- ! #/
,
!&/0'#& /01% !0'
23%#&$ ?#&$-$ 3!3# -0"!6 !0'
!023%#&) 9
*+ D
2$%/ !0'
23%#&$ 4$ 3!3# !&>!0!
!0'
!023%#& * 8+
-=&#<# 2-&3 !$#$ 7:
--6
/
2 -->
,-.(/0'#& /01% !0'
23%#&$ ?$
3!3# -0"!6 !0'
!023%#&) 7*8+ 9:
' - ##
'-'
#
- -6 ( %" A,-! #/
/!0 /01%'
3!3# -0"!6 !0'
!023%#&79! #/ / 55 -6
- -6 - ! #/ 1
0 2+
3!3# !&>!0!'
%!"!0
!.%! ##79!//55 4 ) 0
B4( #
0 ,'
,
#6 "
/
1
0
02+ #-
8
)
#60 '
- #
! 5 / +
#6
6
#-
6 - , ,8
0
-
0
#6'
GD7 9
)
%7
9#' , #
/ + 6 #6 1
#
0 #-
2+,8
.
'
' -
# 6 - #
0 , #
, "6'%, 8
#6% "
/ ' 0
0'
"
- #'
-
% #% %
,
0- 1
' 0 '
'
H -
' -
# !
# '
' #
!
--%
,6 '
-
#
- -
' / # & ,# ,-
'
-6
#
% D
#'
,
1
'-'
>
'
0 '6 -
0-
#
0-
-'
0 # # 1
0%#
--
0
-%
-% -%
-%#
#
-
0 -
0 6% -
# 6
,
--# ' # -
# ' -'
# +
0 % "
/ 1
'
6%,
,6
'
% #
,-
6 - #
0##
#)
8
)
6 - ,
, 1
- # --
#- -
6 '
+ 6
% "
/
6 6 - ,
)
6
0
06 - , #
-6 # -
,6 '
6
)
%
###
-
#
6 ,' 1 9
'% "
/
--,6--6
)
1
0F 5 &##-
-6 - ," A,-! #/
#- ) 0
"
/
## 6 # '
%
#
,
#
6 - ,- , #
/
, --6
0
#
0 # # , 1
2+6 - ,
)
%6
# - ,) -0
-
! ./ / +
%
/
1 - --
,
# - ,)
#
% .55
5#
, - / ,-6
0
# ,
2+3 40
!
5%4 + /% -
! 2 %(
-
2
--
1 #
0 % , 1
1 # % ,
'
57&
8 9 -
#
--
,
, / ,-6
--6 * + :
- @ !#
0;
I ; @ #,- I ;