Balwinder Singh v. State Of Punjab And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No. 6970 of 2022 (O&M) Date of Decision: 24.03.2022 Balwinder Singh .......... Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and others .......... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESHWAR THAKUR

Present:

Ms. Raman Preet Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Bhupender Beniwal, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab (Through Video Conferencing) **** SURESHWAR THAKUR, J. (ORAL) CRM-7138-2022 1.

The application is allowed, as prayed for.

2.

As averred, Sh. Jharmal Singh, who is the main contesting party, is ordered to be impleaded as co-respondent No. 4, in the array of respondents.

3.

Registry to place on record the amended memo of parties, and, paginate in the paper-book accordingly.

4.

Application is disposed of.

MAIN CASE 1.

The petitioner, through the instant petition, cast under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C., seeks an appropriate direction to co-respondent No. 2 for the conducting of a fair and impartial inquiry, and, investigations into the representations of 15.07.2021 & of 09.10.2021, as, made by him, before the authorities concerned. The afore representations are appended with the petition, respectively as Annexures P-5 & P-6. DINESH KUMAR 2022.03.24 18:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

CRM-M No. 6970 of 2022 (O&M) -22.

The learned State Counsel, does not have any objection, to an order being made by this Court to the respondents concerned, to look into and decide through a speaking order, representations Annexure P-5 & P-6. 3.

Consequently, this Court directs the respondents concerned, to within three weeks hereafter, hence decide Annexures P-5 & P-6, through a speaking order.

4.

Petition is disposed of.

March 24, 2022 ( SURESHWAR THAKUR ) 'dk kamra'

JUDGE Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No DINESH KUMAR 2022.03.24 18:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document