← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-A/313/2020dismissed

Parveen Sidana v. Balbir Singh

2022-07-19Mrs. Justice Meenakshi I. Mehta3 pages

 

                

         !           "##$%&% '!( )   

     

     

  

                 

   !"

# $ #   

   

%  #   &  $$ # $ '

#    $ ($))* ( $   &   &   + +, ,+) (   -!.    & 

$$ # !/ # 0#  # # #  # $  #($

 &  ! # $  #($ + , ,+#   -

   $ $ -   !&  .(             #  .    $$ #   $   (   $! $!  #   1

!"!"#$ %!% % &

 #" (# #   ! &    ( 

        2       #  $   #        #    $ #$( 1   #  $   #  #      &  

# #& #! # #  ## $  #( $ &   &  &!# 

  $& # $ $ -# 

 &   #! # #     $.  &  .

! . # ($$ ($$

   !$ 

( #  

5.!   #      (& #    #  ! #  #&$. .

 ( $ !#

   $ 

#($ &   & $  $&.(!

$&+ +, ,+)+ , ,+    

#  $     (& .(  #   -     $ 

  &    $   &  #  $'



$

 In these circumstances, it becomes explicit that the applicant has not been able to justifiably explain the above-said inordinate delay on her part. 5.

Resultantly, the present application stands dismissed. CRM-A No.313 of 2020 As a sequel to the dismissal of the afore-said application as moved by the applicant for seeking condonation of the delay in filing the

!"!"#$ % % % & present appeal, it follows that the application in hand, as preferred for seeking leave to appeal, also deserves dismissal on the ground of its having become hopelessly time barred and the same stands dismissed accordingly.         *+,- ./0!(1