(O&M)Sangat Singh v. Rajesh Anand

RSA No. 3064 of 2003 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No. 3064 of 2003 (O&M) Date of decision : 13.2.2023.

...

Sangat Singh ................Appellant vs.

Rajesh Anand and another .................Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Madaan Present: Mr. Amit Jain, Senior Advocate with Mr. Varun Parkash, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Sumit Sangwan, Advocate for Mr. Sukant Gupta, Advocate for respondent no.1. ...

H. S. Madaan, J. (Oral) Mr. Sumit Sangwan, Advocate appearing on behalf of respondent No.1, states that Mr. Sukant Gupta, Advocate has informed him that respondent No.1 had taken away the brief from him stating that since he had handed over possession of the property in question to the appellant- landlord, the appeal was not to be contested.

In view of such statement made by Mr. Sumit Sangwan, Mr. Amit Jain, Senior counsel for the appellant states that he does not have any instructions in the matter, though the Court may dispose of BANITA CHUGH 2023.02.15 17:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

RSA No. 3064 of 2003 -2the regular second appeal in view of the statement of Mr. Sumit Sangwan, granting him liberty to get the appeal revived if some cause of action still survives to the appellant. Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of as infructuous with liberty granted to the appellant, as prayed for. ( H.S. Madaan ) 13.2.2023 Judge chugh Whether speaking / reasoned Yes / No Whether reportable Yes / No BANITA CHUGH 2023.02.15 17:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document