Sarita v. State Of Haryana And Others

CRM-M-6314-2023 -12023:PHHC:102386

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-6314-2023 Date of Decision: 08.08.2023 Sarita .... Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - Mr. Sandeep Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Arjun Lakhanpal, Addl. A.G., Haryana.

NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Prayer in this petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for issuance of a direction to respondents No. 2 and 3 for re-investigation personally or direct any higher officer or special investigation team in case FIR No. 65 dated 06.03.2022 (Annexure P-1) under Sections 109, 354-A, 354-B, 376 and 511 read with Section 34 IPC, Police StationUrban Estate Rohtak or in the alternative to submit the status report of the aforesaid FIR.

At the outset, on instructions from ASI Manju, learned counsel for the State submits that the instant petition has been rendered infructuous as after completion of investigation, cancellation report has already been presented by the police before the Illaqa Magistrate on 27.04.2022.

RISHU KATARIA 2023.08.09 19:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

CRM-M-6314-2023 -22023:PHHC:102386 Learned counsel for the petitioner is unable to dispute the aforesaid fact.

In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.

08.08.2023 ( NIDHI GUPTA ) rishu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No RISHU KATARIA 2023.08.09 19:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment