Sunil Kumar v. State Of Haryana And Another

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP-2894-2026 Date of Decision: 10.03.2026 SUNIL KUMAR

...Petitioner

Vs.

STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR.

...Respondents

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Ms. Harmanpreet Kaur, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Akshit Pathania, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana Mr. Tushar Kaushik, Advocate for Mr. Ravish Kaushik, Advocate for respondent No.2 *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondent to release admitted amount of Rs.2,29,09,813/-.

2.

On 02.02.2026 the following order was passed by this Court:- "Learned senior counsel for the petitioner asserts that the work of construction of community centre and road renovation was duly completed by the petitioner, who raised bills, Annexures P-2 and P-5, for payment, which has not been released. He has made a reference to the completion certificate, Annexure P-6, as well as monitoring report (at page 30 of the paper-book) to assert that the work has been completed to the satisfaction of the officials of Municipal Corporation, Rohtak.

DEEPAK BISSYAN 2026.03.10 16:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP-2894-2026 -2Advance copy of the petition be served upon the respondents.

On asking of the Court, Mr. Deepak Vashisth, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana puts in appearance on behalf of the respondent No.1. Mr. Ravish Kaushik, Advocate puts in appearance on behalf of the respondent No.2-Municipal Corporation, Rohtak and requests for short accommodation to get instructions.

List on 10.03.2026."

3.

Learned counsel for the respondent No.2 on instructions from Executive Engineer Manjeet Dahiya, M.C. Rohtak submits that outstanding dues of petitioner would be released within a period of five months from today.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to the aforesaid arrangement.

5.

In the wake of statement of both sides, the instant petition stands disposed of.

6.

Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE March 10, 2026 Deepak DPA Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No DEEPAK BISSYAN 2026.03.10 16:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document