Ram Kishan(H.U.F.)S/O Sh. Het Ram v. Union Of India & Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH **** 201-1 CWP-5065-2003 Date of Decision: 08.12.2025 RAM KISHAN(H.U.F.)

...Petitioner

Versus

UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS

...Respondents

And Sr.

No.

Case No.

Petitioner(s) Respondent(s) 2.

CWP-7569-2003 Shanti Devi Union of India & Others 3.

CWP-7803-2003 Phool Kaur (Deceased) through LRs Union of India & Others CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present:- None Advocate for the petitioner(s) Mr. Saurav Kapoor, Sr. Standing Counsel (through V.C.) Mr. Rana Gurtej Singh, Jr. Standing Counsel (through V.C.) Ms. Muskan Gupta, Advocate, Ms. Tanya Kumar, Advocate and Ms. Muskan Chauhan, Advocate for respondent-Income Tax Department *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

As common issues are involved in the captioned petitions, the same are hereby disposed of by this common order. 2.

As per office report, the petitioner(s) either stand served or could not be served on account of death or incomplete address. 3.

The matters are pending before this Court since 2003 and relate to waiver of interest on compensation. There is no stay in favour of the petitioners. No counsel is representing them. Any order of this Court DEEPAK BISSYAN 2025.12.10 10:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP-5065-2003 and connected cases -2on merits would be more academic than effective, thus, we find it appropriate to dispose of the petitions with liberty to petitioners to move an appropriate application within three months from today, if cause survives.

4.

Disposed of with aforesaid liberty.

5.

Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE (PARMOD GOYAL) JUDGE December 08, 2025 Deepak DPA Whether Speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No DEEPAK BISSYAN 2025.12.10 10:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document