← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/5295/2026allowed

Ram Niwas v. State Of Haryana

2026-04-27Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh2 pages

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh Criminal Misc. No. M-5295 of 2026 Date of Decision: 27.04.2026 Ram Niwas ... Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Haryana ... Respondent(s) CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh.

Present:

Mr. Sandeep Saini, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

Mr. Ramender Singh Chauhan, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana, for the respondent.

Surya Partap Singh, J.

1.

This petition for anticipatory bail is the first petition filed by the petitioner under Section 482 of 'the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023'. It has been filed with regard to a case arising out of FIR No. 362 dated 26.11.2025, for the commission of offence punishable under Section(s) 21(b), 29 and 27A of 'the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985' Police Station Sadar Safidon, District Jind, Haryana. 2.

Vide order dated 31.01.2026, the petitioner was admitted to interim anticipatory bail, subject to the condition of furnishing bonds to the satisfaction of arresting officer. It was also directed that the petitioner shall join the investigation.

3.

The learned State Counsel has filed status report. The same be taken on record.

DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2026.04.27 15:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Criminal Misc. No. M-5295 of 2026 4.

Heard.

5.

It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that in compliance with order dated 31.01.2026, the petitioner has already joined the investigation, and that nothing has been left to be recovered from the possession of petitioner. In view of above, the learned counsel for the petitioner has requested that the order dated 31.01.2026 be made absolute. 6.

The learned State counsel, on instructions from 'ASI Sandeep Kumar', has submitted that the petitioner has joined investigation, and that for further investigation of this case his custodial interrogation is not required.

7.

The record has been perused carefully.

8.

Keeping in view the aforesaid submissions and the fact that the petitioner has already joined the investigation, it is hereby ordered that the petitioner is entitled for anticipatory bail. Hence, the present petition is hereby allowed and the order dated 31.01.2026, whereby the petitioner was accorded the benefit of interim anticipatory bail, is hereby made absolute. (Surya Partap Singh) Judge April 27, 2026 "DK"

Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2026.04.27 15:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document