Yashpal And ORS v. State Of Punjab And ANR

 
       
 



!"#"

$ % & '&  #()* $

( +#

&&&&&& 

"

"

$ +# , +#-# .



-$/0 $ $

( +

&&&&&&  #) $ $ #
 %

 12 & .

 3 

 


  
  
 


  





 





 !

""""

 3 

&

5+*6 #$
 $



 


% & 

'()
 *+*
 ,- !,!,


 
 




.!,
./+
./0
./1
.0*

*!,2#

(3

 
3
4
# 



 

  ,+ ,!

!,!*
56
2!7

8
*1 ,!

!,!*
 


 
 2 9:* ;

< 




.1!
3 

%
& 

'()

*+*
 ,- !,!,
 
.!,
./+
./0
./1.0*
*!,2#
(3




 
3
4
#
56
2*7



&


  
 

 

:!;

4


 


  26
2!

 










$


 
 

:=;





 :.;


# 
 %
 
 
  











 *

4

$

 
 %




:+;

< 


 




 
 !



 

%


 

 
6
2!
 
 
 

 

 
< 
3>( &

 

*, ,= !,!*


 
   

 

 
 


 

4
< 
3>( &  
 
 
$



 
 



    




$
 
 $
  
$





 



  




 
6
 

 

<  






 
 $
 
 
 

 
 



  

 


  
$
 



 
 

 
 

:/;

4

*- ,+ !,!*
?

 

  



3 
@ 

 
#
 ,= !,!*






 % 




 

 
 
3




2 966
(


 
  

$
 
  
  

 
 


 

<    




$
 
 

 








 


$ 





$



' 



  

   


( 
8

'()
 



 



$
A  


)

 
)%

) 


A  
3




  

A  






   
 ?

Learned State counsel submits that though as per the report, the parties have compromised, but the fact remains that offences punishable under Sections 465, 467, 468 and 471 of the IPC are non compoundable.

In response thereto, learned counsel for the petitioners relies upon the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in Criminal Appeal No.1489 of 2012, titled as 'Ramgopal and another vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh'. The relevant portion of which reads as underB2 9**

<






 
C2   D
 

 
$

   


6




 =!,
3 
$
  
$
 





 


 
 
=!,
3  3


 
6



 4 
< 


 

 

$
 
  


=!,
3  


$

$


 


 

 
%

C  D
 



$
%


   
 
 
 
 
 


 
 


%
 
=!,
3 






 %
 

$
 
3

 


.1!
3 
< 
3
% 

 
 
 

  


 



 
 
 


.1!

3 






 


$ 3
>


 


 ?

E


 
 
 

$
 
3

   



 


 




'()  *+*
 ,- !,!,


 




 
.!,
./+
./0
./1
.0*

*!,2#

(3


 
3 4
# 



  , are, hereby, quashed qua the petitioners.

5 3 



& '& 











F  
 %>  A  
)