Vijay Kumar And ORS v. State Of Punjab

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.7651 of 2021 Date of Decision: November 09, 2021 Vijay Kumar and others

...Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab

...Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMOL RATTAN SINGH Present:- Mr. Shadab Ahmad, Advocate for Mr. Pankaj Garg, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Rana Harjasdeep Singh, DAG, Punjab.

*** Amol Rattan Singh, J. (Oral) By this petition, filed under the provisions of Section 438 of the Cr.P.C., the petitioners seek the concession of anticipatory bail, upon FIR No.13, dated 10.01.2020, having been registered at Police Station City-2, District Mansa, alleging therein the commission of an offence punishable under Section 380 of the IPC.

Pursuant to the orders of this court, dated 27.08.2021 and 24.09.2021, learned State counsel, on instructions from H.C. Amrit Pal Singh, submits that the petitioners have joined investigation and their custodial interrogation is not required presently. That being so, without making any comment on the actual merits of the case, this petition has been rendered infructuous and and is disposed of as such.

SARITA RANI 2021.11.12 10:53 I attest to the accuracy of this order

CRM-M No.7651 of 2021 - 2 - However, if the petitioners' custodial interrogation is required at any stage hereinafter, in the context of the FIR in question, he would be given 10 days notice before arrest, duly shown to be served upon them. Naturally, if the complainant is aggrieved in any manner, of lack of proper investigation, he/she would be always at liberty to avail of his/her remedy as per law.

November 09, 2021 (AMOL RATTAN SINGH) sarita JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes   



 
SARITA RANI 2021.11.12 10:53 I attest to the accuracy of this order