Vinesh Kumari v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH -.- CRM-M-6418-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision : 23.05.2024 Vinesh Kumari ....Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Haryana ....Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA

Present:

Mr. Siddarth, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Reepu Dhaman Bangal, AAG Haryana.

-.- SUDEEPTI SHARMA, J. (Oral) This is the second petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.314, dated 20.09.2022, registered under Sections 498-A, 328, 302, 304-B, 406, 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, at Police Station Ballabgarh, Faridabad.

2.

On 15.01.2024, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the earlier petition bearing number CRM-M-611112023 and it was dismissed as withdrawn. 3.

A perusal of the FIR shows that there are specific allegations against the present petitioner. The same was the situation when the petitioner filed the earlier anticipatory bail application bearing No. CRM - M - 61111-2023. Once the earlier anticipatory bail application has been TRIPTI SAINI 2024.05.28 12:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-6418-2024 (O&M) -2withdrawn by the petitioner herself, no ground is made out to entertain the second anticipatory bail application and it is not maintainable. 4.

In view the above, the present petition is dismissed. 5.

Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. May 23, 2024 (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) tripti JUDGE Whether speaking/non-speaking : Speaking Whether reportable : Yes/No TRIPTI SAINI 2024.05.28 12:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document