Rohit Kumar v. State Project Director
!"#$%"&'('#)*+ +
* , -+. . -
!
"
# $ %
#
& &
%
. - /+
0 1 '
"
is praying for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the declaration/information (Annexure P-8) downloaded from the website of the respondent, whereby the petitioner has been held to be not eligible to be considered for appointment on the post of TGT Science (non medical).'"
&
( & )$
% %
%*+ &,
-
) %% %
-.
/- -/01+#2 30,%
%
% $
* & 45 % TGT Science (non medical). The petitioner applied under OBC category for the post of TGT Science (non-medical) in pursuance to the abovesaid -1-
advertisement dated 26.02.2019 (Annexure P-1). The petitioner duly appeared in the written examination and qualified the same. The result was declared by the respondent in the month of August, 2019 on the website. The petitioner was called by the respondent for the purpose of scrutiny of documents on 17.09.2019. The documents of the petitioner were considered at the time of scrutiny of documents, however, it transpired that under the column of remarks, it was mentioned that the verification for recognition of Central University, Rajasthan for integrated M.Sc. B.Ed. Physics is pending.
3.
Taking into consideration the qualification of the petitioner, a meeting of Departmental Officers and Subject Experts from Colleges was convened on 30.09.2019. In the meeting, it was discussed that as the petitioner has passed integrated M.Sc. B.Ed. with teaching subject of Physics instead of Science, it was observed that the matter may be recommended for clarification from the Central University, Rajasthan, from where the petitioner had acquired the qualification. Accordingly, a letter dated 03.12.2019 was sent to the Vice Chancellor, Central University, Rajasthan, for clarification. Accordingly, Central University, Rajasthan, gave its clarification vide letter dated 23.12.2019 (Annexure R-1) whereby, it was clarified that the case of the petitioner can be considered to teach Science (nonmedical) at secondary level. In light of the letter/clarification dated 23.12.2019 (Annexure R-1), a Committee was constituted by the respondent to go into the eligibility of the petitioner. The Committee submitted its report dated 13.01.2020 (Annexure R-2) and as per the -2-
said report, it was held that the case of the petitioner cannot be considered as eligible for the post of TGT Science (non medical). Relevant extract of the abovesaid report is reproduced hereinbelow:- "After discussion, it was recommended by the committee that a clarification may be sought from Central University, Rajasthan whether the candidate who have passed Integrated M.Sc. B.Ed with teaching subject of Physics instead of Science can be considered eligible for the post of TGT Sc. Non Medical or not. Accordingly, a letter vide No. PD/SSA/EA1/2019/13181 dated 03.12.2019 was sent to the Vice Chancellor, Central University, Rajasthan for clarification on the above issue. In response to that the Controller of Examination, Central University, Rajasthan has clarified as under:
67
(
9
::;#0:-/01:0<0=0
/< 0- -/01 %
+; && 9
-/0>' !
?/0>, %'
!
+ (,
(
-/0=
& $ ( %
$ )( 9;
+
$ & 39:9;:
!
:-<= +
3':-/0>:0:/4/>34/.,, <0 (-/0>"
<&
&( "$
"&&
@$ &
(&$&
# 9; & -/04+
3'''3 ' 9 <.. A 9 .-3/0:-/0-:9;, @ &% )
(&$&
:
3
%
B $ (" & >/C
+ -3-
@$ &, !
% 9; B
!
&
&$& ) +9 &,
(&$&
)$& )) $ ( &
% ) 93 &
(&$&)
% ( @$ & % # %
&)&(%
)
$%
& #
D
#
% (
**300 )
&
%
)
%&&")"
&
!
& %;
'
!
ED 101 Basics Educa on ED 102 Senior Secondary Educa on in India: Status, Challenges and Strategies ED- 201 Philosophy of Physics ED-202 Learner and Learning ED 301 Teaching Approaches and Strategies ED 302 Pedagogy of Physics-I ED 401 Learning Assessment ED 402 Pedagogy of Physics-II ED 501 Internship ED 502 Internship and Teaching Prac ce ED 503 Project/ Disserta on ED 601 Classroom Organiza on and Management )$ &&
( % ( & ( % -4-
( " ) @$ & %
#
&( %
% !
&$& ) ;&)&%
%* 9 & 4.
Aggrieved against the action of the respondent in not considering the case of the petitioner for appointment on the post of TGT Science (non medical), the petitioner has filed the present writ petition.
>
8
&
) &% %
) &%&
-< 0- -/01+#2 30,
&
% )(
&$ ( " "
& % ) +3 &, &)&) %
%TGT Science (non medical).
.
F &
&) & :&
%
-< 0- -/01 +#2 30, )(
&$ ( "
&( )( % ;2
) "
!
"
& )( &)& ) %
%TGT Science (non medical).
' $
&
&%
&
3) &"
-5-
=
&($&$
"
" @@ &% %
-.
/- -/01+#2 30,%
%
%TGT Science (non medical).
9.
A perusal of the facts of the case would show that the case of the petitioner was duly considered by the Committee of Experts constituted by the respondent
&$ )"
!
&)&%
%
%TGT Science (non medical) 0/
'"&&& & " ? 2
&
&( % % 2
% )
$
%?G)&
'
?G)&
) H1 &(& %
&
&() %
" )( 7
%&%&
@@ &% "& ) &(&%) )(
) & "$
)&( %2 ) &$ &I E 0- ' ! "# $%& '( )!* #+ ,--- ./ ?G)&
& % %2 ) %& %
-6-
'"
% ) )
$ &%
$ ) ) &2 2
" )&(%
& %2 )
$ " %
0< ' & $0&1 1 &#) ,-- / 2 ?G)&
&
? G 2 &(& % " 2 )(2 )
'* & $0 3#+ ,-- 2 ,4?G)&
& &
&( %
%
& & &
2
0>
' 51 3 & 6
#) ,--2 ,2 ?G)&
)
%
& $ )(2 %% &
0.
'* 77 ! 77 5 8&11#+ ,--2 .- ?G)&
%% )& & &
&$ %
)(2
') 0 & $
%& &
&! 9#+ ,--
4, & & -7-
)
&%
&
& %
) 0=+
& "& ")(?G)&
)$ ) )(
0< /0 -/-/+#2 3-, &)&%
%
%TGT Science (non medical) and as there is no allegation of mala fide alleged against the Committee, as such, no relief can be granted to the petitioner. 19.
Accordingly, t
"
20.
Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand(s) disposed of.
+ +
. - 7 : J 9 7 )& J 9 -8-