Ram Abhilakh v. Kamal Kishor Yadav ,Ias And ANR



IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH **** COCP No.503 of 2019 Date of Decision: 04.10.2019 Ram Abhilakh Petitioner

Versus

Kamal Kishor Yadav, IAS, Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Chandigarh and another Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

Present:

Mr. Barjesh Mittal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashish Rawal, Advocate for the respondents.

**** AVNEESH JHINGAN, J (Oral):

The only dispute pending in the contempt petition is with regard to interest to be paid to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the respondents, on instructions from respondent No.2, states that claim of the petitioner would be considered and if any amount is found due, same shall be disbursed within three months.

In view of statement made, learned counsel for the petitioner states that no cause of action survives for pursuing the contempt petition. The contempt petition is disposed of.

In case statement made today in the Court is not adhered to, petitioner would be at liberty to revive the contempt petition. [AVNEESH JHINGAN] JUDGE October 04, 2019
    

  

   
    

    PANKAJ BAWEJA 2019.10.05 11:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Ciourt, Chandigarh