Taraspal v. State Of Haryana

2024:PHHC:041472 CRM-M-6611-2024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH (219) CRM-M-6611-2024 Date of Decision:- 21.03.2024 Taraspal ......Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana ......Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN ****

Present:

Mr. Satish Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Anmol Malik, DAG, Haryana.

**** ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) 1.

Prayer is for grant of anticipatory bail in FIR No.105 dated 29.05.2020, registered under Sections 148, 149, 323, 325, 307, 201 of IPC, 1860 and Section 25 of Arms Act, registered at Police Station Sanoli, District Panipat 2.

Vide order dated 15.02.2024, this Court while granting the concession of interim anticipatory bail directed the petitioner to join investigation.

3.

Learned State counsel, on instructions from SI Rajesh submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and his custodial interrogation is no longer required.

4.

In view of above, the petition is allowed. The order dated 15.02.2024 granting interim anticipatory bail to the petitioner, is made absolute. However, the petitioner shall join the investigation as and when called upon to do so by the Investigating Agency and shall abide by the Manju 2024.03.23 10:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

2024:PHHC:041472 CRM-M-6611-2024 conditions of Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C.

5.

However, nothing stated above shall be construed as a final expression of opinion on the merits of the case and this order shall not be construed as parity qua any other co-accused. 6.

It is made clear that, in case, the petitioners are found involved in any such activity once again, the State is at liberty to promptly move an appropriate application for cancellation of bail detailing out the circumstances and violation of the condition(s) of bail. (ALOK JAIN) 21.03.2024 JUDGE manju Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No Manju 2024.03.23 10:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document