Surja Ram v. Collector,Hisar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CWP-1014-2001 (O&M) Date of Decision : 25.03.2026 SURJA RAM AND ANR .... Petitioners

VERSUS

COLLECTOR, HISAR AND ORS .... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI Present :

Mr. Vinod Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG Haryana for respondents No.1 to 3. Mr. Manav Dhull, Advocate for Mr. J.S. Duhan, Advocate for respondent No.4. ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL) 1.

Learned counsel for respondent No.4-Gram Panchayat has stated that the present writ petition has since been rendered infructuous as the possession has already been taken by respondent No.4-Gram Panchayat. 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioners' states that he has no instructions in the matter.

3.

In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for respondent No.4, the present writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous with liberty to the petitioner to get it revived in case anything survives. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off. (ALKA SARIN) JUDGE (RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI) 25.03.2026 JUDGE Aman Jain NOTE:

Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: Yes/No AMAN JAIN 2026.03.27 09:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment