High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/5785/2020disposed of

Davisha Verma v. State Of Haryana And Another

2022-09-06Mr. Justice Anoop Chitkara1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-5785-2020 Date of Decision: 06.09.2022 Davisha Sharma ......... Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and another ......... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

Present:

Mr. Ran Vijay Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Rajat Gautam, D.A.G., Haryana.

Mr. Nipun Vashist, Advocate for respondent No. 2.

**** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the parties submit that the connected matter bearing CRM-M-7075-2022 for quashing of FIR on the basis of compromise in which statements of the parties were ordered to record and report was sought. After the receiving of the report, the matter has already been reserved by this Court on 16.08.2022. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the offence is only under Section 66 of the Information and Technology Act and the complainant has no objection, the possibility of this Court accepting the compromise is large. Since the matter has been compromised between the parties, the present petition has been rendered infructuous.

It is clarified that no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner till the pronouncement of CRM-M-7075-2022. Liberty reserved to file a fresh petition in case the petition for compromise is dismissed.

(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 06.09.2022 Jyoti-II Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No JYOTI 2022.09.07 00:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document