Surender And ORS v. State Of Haryana And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH RFA No.1259 of 2021 (O&M) Date of decision: 02.03.2022 Surender and others ..Appellant (s)

Versus

State of Haryana and others ..Respondent (s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL PresentMr. Aashish Chopra, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Gurpreet Randhawa, Advocate Mr. Rakesh Nehra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Pankaj Kaushik, Advocate Mr. S.P. Chahar, Advocate, Mr. Nitin Jain, Advocate, Mr. Aditya Jain, Advocate, Mr. Sandeep Singal, Advocate, Mr. Sandeep K. Sharma, Advocate, Ms. Anita Balyan, Advocate, Mr. Viresh Dahiya, Advocate, Mr. Deepak Girotra, Advocate, Mr. Govind Chauhan, Advocate, Mr. N.C. Kinra, Advocate, Mr. Harsh Kinra, Advocate, Mr. Pardeep Singh Poonia, Advocate, Mr. Prateek Gupta, Advocate, Mr. Ram Kumar Saini, Advocate, Mr. S.P. Khatri, Advocate, Mr. Ashwani Bakshi, Advocate, Mr. M.S. Rana, Advocate, Mr. M.S. Khillan, Advocate, Mr. Ravinder Malik, Advocate, Mr. Y.P. Malik, Advocate, Mr. Sudhir Hooda, Advocate, Mr. S.R. Hooda, Advocate, Mr. N.K. Malhotra, Advocate, Mr. Vivek Khatri, Advocate, Mr. Kamal Mor, Advocate, Mr. Saurabh Dalal, Advocate for the landowners.

Ms. Vibha Tewari, AAG, Haryana and Mr. Shivendra Swaroop, AAG, Haryana.

*** ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.

CM No.2791 and 2792-CI of 2021 For the reasons stated in the applications, the same are allowed and delay of 997 days in refiling the appeal and delay of 840 days in filing the appeal is condoned. However, the landowners shall not be entitled to interest for ASHOK KUMAR 2022.03.11 11:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

the period of delay.

Main Case For orders, see order of the even date passed in Regular First Appeal No.458 of 2016, titled as M/s Satkarta Realtors (P) Ltd. vs. State of Haryana and others.

02.03.2022 (ANIL KSHETARPAL) ashok JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No ASHOK KUMAR 2022.03.11 11:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document