Jimmy Travels v. State Of Haryana
! "# $%&'&'()%*
%+,()-%)&+
.#
"/ 0
.#
#
Present:
Mr. Arun Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Sandeep Moudgil, Additional Advocate General, Haryana for the respondents.
****
"/ 0
#
Learned counsel for the respondents states that Section 66 (3) (l) of the Motor Vehicles Act has, in any event, now been amended w.e.f. 27.09.2001. He further states that the petition is, therefore, now infructuous. The petition is, therefore, dismissed as infructuous. Needless to add that if anything survives, the petitioner is at liberty to apply to have the petition revived.
"/
# ! Whether speaking/reasoned Yes /No Whether reportable Yes /No Swarnjit Singh 2017.04.24 16:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document