Paramjeet Singh @ Pawaneep Singh @Pamma And Others v. State Of Punjab And Another

CRM-M No. 8489-2021 --1--

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-8489-2021

Reserved on: 25.08.2022

Pronounced on: 27.09.2022 Paramjeet Singh @ Pawandeep Singh ......Petitioners @ Pamma and others Vs.

State of Punjab and another ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

Present:

Mr. V.S. Kathpal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Virat Rana, AAG, Punjab Mr. M.S. Dua, Advocate for respondent No.2.

*** ANOOP CHITKARA J.

FIR No.

Dated Police Station Sections 17.09.2020 Khuhi Khera, District 452, 323, 506, 148, 149 IPC Fazilka The petitioners, arraigned as accused in the above captioned FIR, have come up before this Court under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of the FIR and all consequential proceedings based on the compromise with the aggrieved person. 2.

During the pendency of the petition, the accused and the aggrieved person have compromised the matter, and its copy is annexed with this petition as Annexure P-2. 3.

After that, the petitioners came up before this Court to quash the FIR, and in the quashing petition, impleading the aggrieved person as respondent. 4.

On 11.5.2021, the aggrieved person Lovejinder Singh (R-2) appeared before the JMIC, Fazilka and stated that there would be no objection if the court quashes this FIR and consequent proceedings. As per the concerned court's report dated 12.5.2021, the parties consented to the quashing of FIR and consequent proceedings without any threat. ANALYSIS & REASONING:

5.

However, the petitioners did not arraign aggrieved Makhan Singh as a respondent in this case.

SONIA ARORA 2022.09.30 17:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M No. 8489-2021 --2-- 6.

Since all the victims did not state about their no objection to the compromise and also the reasons which led to the compromise, as such this court cannot proceed further in this matter.

7.

Given above, the petition is dismissed. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioners to file a fresh petition and there would be no necessity re-examine Lovejinder Singh (R-2) and the accused, whose statements stand recorded. The copies of the statements alongwith report would suffice.

Petition dismissed in the terms mentioned above, with liberty reserved. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 27.09.2022 sonia arora Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes Whether reportable:

No.

SONIA ARORA 2022.09.30 17:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document