Dakshita And ANR. v. State Of Ut, Chandigarh And ORS.

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh CRWP No. 1647 of 2022 Date of Decision: 23.2.2022 Dakshita and another ......Petitioners

Versus

State of U.T., Chandigarh and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESHWAR THAKUR

Present:

Mr. M.K.Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Shashank Bhandari, Addl. P.P., U.T., Chandigarh. **** SURESHWAR THAKUR , J.

(ORAL) 1.

The present petition has been filed under Articles 226, and, 21 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus hence directing respondents No. 2 and 3 to give protection to the life and liberty of the petitioners, and also against any interference in the peaceful life of the petitioners being made at the behest of respondents No. 4 to 8. 2.

The learned State Counsel, does not have any objection, to an order being made by this Court to the respondents concerned, to look into and decide through a speaking order, representation Annexure P-4. Consequently, this Court directs the respondents concerned, to within three weeks hereafter, hence decide Annexure P-4, through a speaking order.

4.

Petition is disposed of.

5.

A copy of this order be given dasti on payment of usual charges. (SURESHWAR THAKUR) JUDGE February 23, 2022 Gurpreet Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No GURPREET SINGH 2022.02.23 17:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh