Palo v. F C (Revenue) Pb. & ORS

IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.5661 of 1994 (O&M) Date of Decision:09.02.2015 Palo

...Petitioner

Versus

Financial Commissioner (Revenue), Punjab and another ... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL

Present:

Mr. Anurag Chopra, Advocate for the applicant-petitioner.

Mr. K.K. Gupta, Addl. A.G. Punjab.

1.

To be referred to the reporters or not?

2.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest. DEEPAK SIBAL, J. ( Oral ) C.M. No.11130 of 2014 This is an application for bringing on record the legal representatives of the petitioner, who is stated to have expired on 12.3.2004. In view of the averments made in the application, the same is allowed and legal representatives of the petitioner as mentioned in para-2 of the application are brought on record.

Registry is directed to make necessary correction in the memo of parties.

Main case Learned counsel for the petitioner prays that he may be permitted to withdraw this petition.

Dismissed as withdrawn.

( DEEPAK SIBAL ) JUDGE 09.02.2015 rajeev RAJEEV THAKRAL 2015.02.09 12:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh