Pardeep v. State Of Haryana
CRA-S-586-SB-2018 2024:PHHC: 049966
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH CRA-S-586-SB-2018 Date of decision: 15.04.2024 PARDEEP .... PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA ...RESPONDENT(S) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI
Present:
Mr. Harmanpreet Kaur, Advocate for the appellant(s).
Mr. Rajiv Goel, DAG, Haryana.
**** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (Oral) The present appeal has been preferred against the order dated 16.11.2017 passed by the Sessions Judge, Ambala vide which the said Court imposed penalty upon the appellant under Section 446 of Cr.P.C., 1973 for not producing the accused Chattar Sain in the Court against whom FIR No.258 under Section 379-A of IPC was registered at Police Station, Ambala City on 28.07.2016.
Learned counsel for the appellant contends that vide order dated 04.03.2020, Rs.15,000/- stood deposited by the appellant and now a further amount of Rs.10,000/- stands deposited making a total amount of Rs.25,000/-.
In view of the above, the present appeal stands disposed of. (JASJIT SINGH BEDI) JUDGE 15.04.2024 Kusum Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No KUSUM 2024.04.15 16:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Punjab & Haryana High Court, CHD