Madan Pal & ORS v. State Of Haryana & ORS

106 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.13160-2000(O&M) Date of Decision: 03.04.2025 Madan Pal Singh Sisodia and others ....Petitioners vs.

State of Haryana and another ....Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL

Present:

Mr. Suman Jain, Advocate and Mr. Rishabh Jain, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. Raman Sharma, Addl. A.G., Haryana Mr. Prince Singh, Advocate for respondent No. 2 *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

The petitioners through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India are seeking direction to respondents to fix their salary in the pay scale of Rs. 5300/- with effect from 01.01.1996. 2.

Mr. Prince Singh, Advocate for respondent No. 2, at the outset, submits that petitioner No. 1 has passed away and all the documents which are on record are relating to petitioner No. 1. With respect to petitioners No. 2 to 7, there is claim for Assured Carrier Progression Scheme and there is no claim for revision of pay scales.

3.

Mr. Suman Jain, Advocate expressed his inability to controvert the fact that petitioner No. 1 has passed away. PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2025.04.03 05:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP No.13160-2000(O&M) -24.

Considering the amount involved and the fact that petitioner No. 1 whose documents are actually on record has passed away, this Court does not find it appropriate to adjudicate the matter on merits. 5.

Disposed of.

6.

Pending Misc. application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 03.04.2025 paramjit Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable:

No PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2025.04.03 05:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document