Virender Singh v. Sugar Federation Haryana & ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP No. 13188-2000(O&M) Date of Decision: 07.04.2025 Virender Singh ....Petitioner vs.

Sugar Federation Haryana and others ....Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL

Present:

None for the petitioner Mr. Ashwani Gaur, Advocate and Ms. Shivangi Sharma, Advocate for respondents No. 1 to 7 *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

On 27.09.2000, notice of motion was issued. Notice regarding stay was also issued and it was made clear that appointment of respondent No. 8 would be subject to decision of the writ petition. Order dated 27.09.2000 reads as:- "

Notice of motion for 30-10-2000.

Notice re: stay also.

In the meanwhile, it is ordered that appointment of Respondent No. 8, if made to the post in question, shall be subject to the decision of the writ petition. The official Respondent No. 4 shall also mention the same in the appointment letter.

Copy of this order be give dasti to the learned counsel for the petitioner on payment of usual charges." PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2025.04.07 03:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP No. 13188-2000(O&M) -22.

Mr. Ashwani Gaur, Advocate submits that respondent No. 8 has already retired on attaining the age of superannuation, thus, cause does not survive.

3.

There is no representation of the petitioner. 4.

In the backdrop, the instant petition stands disposed of with liberty to petitioner to move an appropriate application within three months from today, if cause survives.

5.

Pending Misc. application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 07.04.2025 paramjit Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable:

No PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2025.04.07 03:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document