Maunis v. State Of Haryana
CRM-M-6305-2026 -1-
!"#"
$%& '()"*+
% ,- ./ ..
!
""" . +0 -1%
$
%&' ( ) * * +,+' -
.( /0 $
*) ) ) $ $ ) 12 &,
,3,'+,+3 )
+,-$0-00+4
5 )
$
64&3-
./0-
+4
5
0
7 5
) 8 +
) ,3,'+,+3
8
)
59:%7:;:
63<% ) * $
$ * # 8 ) (
)
=
CRM-M-6305-2026 -28
2
$
8 ( )
8
)
>
*) 8 :
$ #
5
)
*
*
>
*) *
,6 ? 4@ *) '+, ) 8
8 *
2 )
)
6@,%+,+3
8
)
>
)
$ 8 8 AB $ 8
#
$ 8
6@,%+,+3
8
',,%+,+3
+&6,+,+3
8
)
)
8 $ ?
AB $
2 )
8
' )
$
8
#
?
$
8 #
8 ) 8
$
$ 8$
#
*
$
CRM-M-6305-2026 -3-
88
)
$
)8
8
2
)
%
:
)
) )
)
$
?
$$)8 6+,,,,,C:
8
8 8 )
$
$
)
88
) 8
=
$ $ #
3 This Court has heard the rival submissions made by learned counsel for the parties at considerable length. 6.
7
)
) $
*
8
$ )
88
D
8
D *
D )
D
8
D )
$
)
)
$ $ $
#
CRM-M-6305-2026 -4-
2 ?
$
)
$
)
5
8
'<
$
)
'< 5
?
$ 7.
)
8
+3,,,C:
8 He is also alleged to have given money to the co-accused for the purpose of arranging the contraband and get it transported. Though he is alleged to be in close contact with the co-accused, however, there is not material on record in the form of call detail record etc. to show that the petitioner was in contact with the co-accused. #
8
?
$
2
$
$ /$ = 7
8
@< 5
8$
$ 8
E
)
$
)
)
2
$ 7
$
'< 5
CRM-M-6305-2026 -5-
) )$
#
+&6,+,+3
$
=8 2
8
*
* )
# $!
!
$
$
8
8 $ 7
8
)
$ $!
)
C
$
7
C7 )
C5 )
:
-0
8*
8
?
8
8
-0
8
8
7
-0
7
-0
$ )
) 8
8)
2>C> -0
) 8
CRM-M-6305-2026 -6- 8$
2>C> *
8
& 2
)12C
8 ) )
$
* $ )
*)
$ 4
$
8
$
= 8
6,
8
$
)
2. 3 & '()"*+
!