Jasmer Singh v. State Of Haryana And ANR.

CRM-29438-2013 CRM-29437-2013 & CRM-A-283-MA-2013 JASMER SINGH V/S RADHE SHAM

Present:

Ms. Lipika, Advocate for Mr. R.S.mamli, Advocate, for the applicant.

Mr. Chanchal K. Singla, Legal Aid Counsel, for the respondent. ****** CRM-29438-2013 Prayer in this application is for condonation of delay of 719 days in filing the present application.

For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and delay of 719 days in filing the present application is condoned. CRM-29437-2013 Allowed as prayed for.

CRM-A-283-MA-2013 Counsel appearing for the applicant submits that the present application was filed against acquittal in the year 2011 and she has a very good case on merit.

Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the judgment of acquittal is well reasoned and leave to appeal should not be granted. He further submits that in case, this Court grants leave to appeal and admit the main appeal, its turn will not come for hearing for decades, as such pendency of the appeal may be treated in-consequential for the respondent. Leave to appeal granted.

Counsel for the respondent submits that he be exempted from furnishing bail bonds/surety bonds before the concerned trial Court or Chief Judicial Magistrate.

Given such undertaking, there shall be no need to furnish bail bonds/surety bonds by the respondent.

Main appeal Admit.

List for final hearing on its own turn as per its queue following the roster of NI Act.

It is clarified that the pendency of this appeal shall not be construed against the accused-respondent in any manner whatsoever. 19.12.2024 (ANOOP CHITKARA ) smriti JUDGE SMRITI 2024.12.20 17:10 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment