Sukhdeep Singh Alias Mintu v. State Of Punjab
1-
!" #$%$ &' ( )*+ *,-
' ./ 01 00
!
"
# .
Mr. Inderjit Sharma, Advocate for the complainant. $$$ 0 -2 /3' % ! &'( ) * (+(, - .)/0 *
* !
12'3 +34((+(& 4+5 ,64-(0 ,-60) * ** (+(,-.)/0 (6 (3 7
4565! 7 " ) ( %7 12 7 * 7! 8
!! +94((+(&
)
* * :
8 !
#
% 8 !
!!
2- *
;
7! !!
!!% !7 * 7! !
* 7! 7 ! :
% ! ! *7 12
*
7 !
: ! ! ! <
) 7 (3+4(+(6 , % !*
* ! !!* 7!
% !*(&
7!
=! * ! 7 8 * 7 ! % ! ! !* 78 *
8 ! > % = : ! &
2 7 ! 7! ! * 6 ;
! "* # !
* 7 *! ! 7! !! > % ! 7! % /
7
=
3- !? ! >
7 = *
7 7=
* ! % !! 9 2 ! ! ! !
!!* 3
!!
:
7! %!! 1
7 ! 7 2 !!!judicial discretion conferred upon the Court has to be properly exercised after application of mind as to the nature and gravity of the accusation, possibility of applicant's fleeing from justice and other factors to decide whether it is a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail as such grant to some extent interferes in the sphere of investigation of an offence. Moreso, the powers for grant of anticipatory bail must be exercised in exceptional and extra ordinary circumstances, whereas, in the present case, no such exceptional circumstances warranting exercise of the powers for grant of anticipatory bail by this Court are existing. @
* !! ! !! 7 27
!! Accordingly, the same is dismissed.
4- ' 2 ! 7 !! = 7 5 7 7
!
* 40 5 ( )*+ *,-