Prem Lata v. State Of Punjab And ORS

CWP-3682-2019 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP-3682-2019 Date of decision: - 11.02.2019 Prem Lata ....Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Present:- Mr. Parshotam Lal Singla, Advocate, for the petitioner.

**** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (ORAL) In the present writ petition, the grievance raised by the petitioner is that she retired on 30.11.1997 after rendering 30 years of service.

Counsel for the petitioner states that till the year 2004, the pension was duly paid to the petitioner, but thereafter without any justification, no pension has been deposited in the account of the petitioner.

Counsel for the petitioner further states that for the relief which has been sought in the present writ petition, the petitioner has served the respondents with a legal notice on 23.11.2018 (Annexure P-9), which is still pending consideration with the respondents and the petitioner will be satisfied, at this stage, in case a time bound direction is issued to the respondents to decide the said legal notice. NARESH KUMAR 2019.02.13 16:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CWP-3682-2019 -2In view of the request made, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and the claim being made by the petitioner, the respondents are directed to decide the legal notice dated 23.11.2018 (Annexure P-9) by passing a speaking order within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. In case after the decision, it is found that the petitioner is entitled for any monetary benefit, the same shall also be released to her within a period of next three months.

Present writ petition stands disposed of.

( HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI ) February 11, 2019 JUDGE naresh.k Whether reasoned/speaking?

Yes Whether reportable?

No NARESH KUMAR 2019.02.13 16:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh