Surjit Singh v. Sushil Kumar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CM-6293-CII-2021 and CM-6295-CII-2021 in/and CIVIL REVISION No.1059 of 2020 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION: 02.08.2021 Surjit Singh .....Petitioner versus Sushil Kumar .....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN Present: Mr. Arun Takhi, Advocate for the applicant/petitioner Mr. Rajiv Dhawan, Advocate for the non-applicant/respondent ..

ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral):

Heard through video conferencing.

CM-6293-CII-2021:

This is an application seeking preponement of the date of hearing in the main revision petition.

Notice of the application.

Mr. Rajiv Dhawan, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the non-applicant/respondent and submits that he has no objection if the application is allowed.

For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. With the consent of the learned counsel, the main case is taken on board today itself.

CM disposed off.

PARKASH CHAND 2021.08.03 12:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CR No.1059 of 2020 - 2 - CM-6295-CII-2021:

This is an application for withdrawal of the main revision petition (CR-1059-2020).

Notice of the application.

Mr. Rajiv Dhawan, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the non-applicant/respondent and submits that he has no objection if the application is allowed and the main revision petition is permitted to be withdrawn.

For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. CIVIL REVISION No.1059 of 2020:

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that a compromise has been affected between the parties and as such the present revision petition has been rendered infructuous and the same may be allowed to be withdrawn.

Dismissed as withdrawn.

(ALKA SARIN) JUDGE 02.08.2021 parkash NOTE:

Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO PARKASH CHAND 2021.08.03 12:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document