Haryana Urban Development Authority v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Panchkula

CWP No.4348 of 2020 [1] 218+111

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH **** CM No.3176-CWP of 2020 in/and CWP No.4348 of 2020 Date of Decision: 24.02.2020 Haryana Urban Development Authority, Panchkula Petitioner

Versus

Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Panchkula Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

Present:

Ms. Radhika Suri, Senior Advocate with Mr. M.S. Kanda, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Yogesh Putney, Advocate and Mr. Ajiteshwar Singh, Advocate for the respondent.

**** AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral) [1] This writ petition has been filed with the prayer for quashing the notice dated 04.12.2019 and order dated 26.12.2019 issued without disposing of the objections raised by the Assessee for referring the matter to the Special Auditor.

[2] It is not disputed by learned counsel for the parties that facts of this case are covered by the decision of this Court in Hind Samachar Ltd. Versus Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax and another reported as [2011] 335 ITR 277 (P&H). [3] The present writ petition is disposed of in same terms as PANKAJ BAWEJA 2020.02.25 09:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Ciourt, Chandigarh

CWP No.4348 of 2020 [2] in Hind Samachar Ltd.'s case (supra). As regards the limitation, it is clarified that the period from filing of the writ petition to the date of delivery of copy of the order shall be excluded. [4] Petitioner, through counsel, is directed to appear before the respondent on 27.02.2020 for hearing.

[5] Since the writ petition is disposed of, the pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. [AJAY TEWARI] JUDGE [AVNEESH JHINGAN] JUDGE February 24, 2020
 
 

           PANKAJ BAWEJA 2020.02.25 09:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Ciourt, Chandigarh