Seema Rani And Another v. State Of Punjab And Others
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-1345-2024 Date of decision : 13.02.2024 SEEMA RANI AND ANOTHER ....Petitioners
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
...Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Present :
Mr. Sirat Sapra, Advocate and Mr. Kartika Sachdeva, Advocate for the petitioners. PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) By way of present petition filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, petitioners are seeking issuance of directions to the official respondents to protect their life and liberty at the hands of respondents No.4 and 5.
2.
Notice of motion.
3.
Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Sr. DAG, Punjab. accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents.
4.
As per the petitioners, they have married on 25.01.2024 against the wishes of respondents No.4 and 5, who happen to be the family member/relative of petitioner No.1 i.e. Seema Rani. 5.
Both the petitioners have claimed themselves to be major relying upon their Aadhar Cards indicating that petitioner No.1-Seema Rani is 15.06.1992 born and petitioner No.2-Kanshi Ram is 09.06.1979 born. Deepak Kumar 2024.02.13 18:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-1345-2024 -2- 2024:PHHC:019702 6.
Without commenting on the legality and validity of the marriage, I deem it appropriate to direct respondent No.2 (Senior Superintendent of Police, District Fazilka ) to look into the representation dated 07.02.2024 (Annexure P-5) submitted by the petitioners. 7.
Keeping in view the fact that both the petitioners claim to have married, I think that if possible, respondent No.2 may call a meeting of the petitioners as well as respondents No.4 and 5 in his presence, so that the parties get rid off their ill feelings and live amicably. 8.
The petition stands disposed off.
February 13, 2024 (Pankaj Jain) Dpr Judge Whether speaking/reasoned :
Yes/No Whether reportable :
Yes/No Deepak Kumar 2024.02.13 18:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document