Arun Yadav v. State Of Haryana And Others

2024:PHHC:020506 CWP-3201-2024 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-3201-2024 Date of Decision: 14.02.2024 Arun Yadav

...Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Haryana and others ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present:- Mr. Sandeep Goyat, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Tanushree Gupta, DAG, Haryana *** TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral) This petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking a writ of certiorari quashing the letter dated 09.01.2024, Annexure P-20, passed by respondent no.3 and entries dated 10.06.2020 at page no.29 of the service book of the petitioner, Annexure P-3, and a writ of mandamus directing respondent no.3 to grant salary for the months of August, 2020 and September, 2020.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance raised herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this stage, the petitioner will be satisfied in case respondent No.2 is directed to decide the pending legal notice, dated 19.12.2023, Annexure P-14, in a specified period.

MANINDER 2024.02.19 17:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.

2024:PHHC:020506 CWP-3201-2024 -23.

Notice of motion.

4.

Ms. Tanushree Gupta, DAG, Haryana, accepts notice and submits that appropriate action will be taken by the second respondent on the pending legal notice, dated 19.12.2023, within a period of three months. 5.

In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof.

6.

Ordered accordingly.

(TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE 14.02.2024 Payal Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No MANINDER 2024.02.19 17:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.