M/S Varun Beverages Ltd v. Hanuman Trades And Another

CRM-A-107-MA-2018
 CRM-A-107-MA-2018 M/s Varun Beverages Ltd. Vs. Hanuman Trades and another

Present:

Mr. Munish Kapila, Advocate for the applicant.

Mr. Vrishank Suri, Advocate for Mr. Akshay Jindal, Advocate for the respondents.

***** CRM-A-107-MA-2018 Applicant's counsel submits that the present application was filed against acquittal in the year 2017 and he has a very good case on merit. Counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the judgment of acquittal is well reasoned and leave to appeal should not be granted. He further submits that in case, this Court grants leave to appeal and admit the main appeal, its turn will not come for hearing for decades, as such pendency of the appeal may be treated in-consequential for the respondent.  Leave to appeal granted.

Counsel for the respondents submits that they be exempted from furnishing bail bonds/surety bonds before the concerned trial Court or Chief Judicial Magistate. They undertakes to surrender before the majesty of Court as and when this Court directed to do so or in case of reversal of the judgment.  Given such undertaking, there shall be no need to furnish bail bonds/surety bonds by the respondents.

Main appeal Admit.

List for final hearing on its own turn as per its queue following the roster. It is clarified that the pendency of this appeal shall be in-consequential for any purpose.

(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 27.09.2024 anju rani ANJU RANI 2024.09.30 16:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh