Harjit Singh @ Harjeet Singh Chadha v. Harpreet Singh Chadha And ORS.

112 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-643-2022 (O&M) CM-1976-CII-2022 Date of Decision: 25.02.2022 HARJIT SINGH @ HARJEET SINGH CHADHA

...Petitioner

Versus

HARPREET SINGH CHADHA AND ORS.

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA

Present:

Mr. Prateek Sodhi, Advocate for the petitioner.

(Presence marked through Video Conference) ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL) CM-1976-CII-2022 Civil Misc. Application is allowed as prayed for, subject to all just exceptions.

Main case Revision petition herein is for issuance of a direction to the learned trial Court to decide the pending application (Annexure P-2) preferred by respondents No.1 and 2 under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 CPC filed in Civil Suit Case No.761 of 2021, seeking interim injunction against the petitioner.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Civil Suit No.761 of 2021 along with relief for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering in the working and management of respondent No.2Company was also sought by respondents No.1 and 2/plaintiffs against the petitioner, who is admittedly a share holder of the company. The learned trial Court granted relief of ex-parte ad-interim stay in favour of the plaintiffs on GURPREET KAUR 2022.02.25 16:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

15.03.2021, which is against the provisions of Companies Act. He further submits that the matter is being adjourned by the trial Court and the pending application (Annexure P-2) preferred by respondents No.1 and 2 under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 CPC filed in Civil Suit Case No.761 of 2021, seeking interim injunction against the petitioner is not being decided. 3.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 4.

Given that due to the restrictions caused by the current pandemic, the Courts below are working on reduced capacity of staff as well as through emergent means of Video-conferencing, it is understandable that certain delays are being caused in disposal of the cases. 5.

In the premise, on this ground alone that the matter is being adjourned by the trial Court, no interference is warranted by this Court. 6.

However, it is expected of the Court below that no unnecessary adjournments will be granted and the pending application shall be disposed of.

7.

Disposed of accordingly.

(ARUN MONGA) JUDGE 25.02.2022 gurpreet Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No GURPREET KAUR 2022.02.25 16:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document