Om Parkash v. State Of Haryana And ORS

    

     



  !"#$"%&'&#()**
         



     





   

 ) +,  * -  

  ...

     



      

  



...

 

 /*

0 1 Petition herein, inter alia, is for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to consider the petitioner for promotion on the post of Naib Tehsildar.

2.

Petition was admitted for hearing on 22.10.2002. 3.

When taken up for final adjudication, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It seems that by sheer effluxion of time and pendency of the writ petition for more than 21 years before this Court, either it has been rendered infructuous or even otherwise the petitioner seems to have lost interest in pursuing the same.

MAMTA MALHOTRA 2022.08.03 16:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh



    4.

Be that as it may, writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file an appropriate application in case any cause of action still survives.

01.08.2022 (ARUN MONGA) mamta JUDGE  

  !"    # "  

  $%    # " MAMTA MALHOTRA 2022.08.03 16:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh